He was sentenced to death by daytime bribes. Library

According to Xinhua, on the morning of 9 December 2025, with the approval of the Supreme People ' s Court, the Second Intermediate People ' s Court of Tianjin City carried out the death penalty against the offender during the day, in accordance with the law.

On 2 June, the People ' s Court ' s Case Book published a reference to the daytime bribery, to clarify the application of the death penalty for the offence of passive bribery and the question of the certainty of the standard of exculpatory punishment.

This figure shows the trial scene (source: Xinhua).

It was mentioned that between 2014 and 2018, the accused had taken advantage of his position as head, general manager, director of the three branches of business extension of Cai Cai (Hong Kong) International Holdings Ltd., director-in-chief of the Investment Bank Department, director-in-chief of capital operations, assistant general manager, deputy general manager, general manager, etc. of China International Holdings Ltd., in order to obtain the benefit of the units concerned in the acquisition of the project and the financing of the enterprise, and had illegally received the sum of RMB 1,108 million. After the accused had arrived at the case, he reported to the disciplinary and inspection authorities that he had been found guilty of serious crimes and had been found guilty of serious crimes.

On 22 May 2024, the Second Intermediate People ' s Court of Tianjin City handed down a judgement in which the accused Baek Yi was convicted of bribery, sentenced to death, deprived of political rights for life and confiscated the entire property of the individual; recovered the proceeds of the bribe and its fruits, surrendered them to the public treasury, and continued to pursue them. After the judgement was delivered, the defendant filed an appeal against it. The Higher People ' s Court of Tianjin City dismissed the appeal and upheld the sentence. On 9 December 2025, he was executed.

It is stated in its reasoning that the amount of money illegally received by the accused amounted to over 1,118 million yuan, which is particularly significant; that, in order to facilitate the acquisition of a foreign project by the incumbent company of a briber, he not only planned the method and means of acquisition with the briber, but also actively helped the briber evade control, with a single bribe amounting to over 1,103 million yuan, which is particularly serious; that, as a staff member of a State-owned financial institution, he actively facilitated the purchase of an overseas project at a high cost of State-owned assets, putting large State-owned assets at an uncertain risk and seriously endangering the financial security of the country; and that over 1,118 million yuan of bribes were paid to him, with only over 630 million dollars having been recovered since the case was filed, with huge sums outstanding. It is highly obscurantistic and, after a first-instance sentence, reverses the original confession and denies most of the crimes. In the Comprehensive Case Section, Baek Fai is a very serious criminal and is sentenced to death in accordance with the law.

When a report is made to the Public Prosecutor ' s Office about a person ' s involvement in a crime committed in a serious position and is confirmed, he or she shall be found to have performed with great merit, but shall not be subject to leniency. Because of the fact that a person ' s performance is different from that normally performed, his or her reporting of a crime is directly linked to his or her own passive bribery offence and the person accused is profiting from the same project in which he or she is the same bribe-paying person; at the same time, taking into account the facts of his or her offence, the nature of the offence, the confession at the trial, etc., he or she can be considered to have committed a particularly serious offence, the consequences of which are particularly serious, and the subjective evilness of the offence is not sufficient to warrant the punishment.

Source: The Great River.

Case review

According to the press, on 28 May 2024, the Second Intermediate People ' s Court of Tianjin City publicly sentenced the former General Manager of China ' s Huai Xian International Holdings Ltd. to death for the crime of passive bribery during the day, depriving the accused of his political rights for life and confiscating the entire property of the individual; and to recover the money and its fruits obtained during the day, handing them over to the State Treasury, which was insufficient, and continue to do so.

He was sentenced to death at first instance in the daytime.

From 2014 to 2018, the accused took advantage of his day-to-day position as head of three departments, general manager, director-in-chief of the Investment Banking Department, director-in-chief of capital operations, assistant general manager, director, deputy general manager and general manager of China International Holdings Ltd., to assist the relevant units in matters such as project acquisition, business financing, etc., and illegally received the sum of over RMB 1,108 million.

The Second Intermediate People ' s Court of Tianjin City held that the defendant ' s conduct during the day constituted bribery. The crime of bribing during the day is particularly large, with particularly serious circumstances and social consequences, which cause particularly significant damage to the interests of the State and the people, is extremely serious and is punishable by death in accordance with the law. While during the day it is proved that the discovery of serious criminal acts by others and the provision of important leads to the detection of other cases are significant achievements, the combination of the facts, the nature, the circumstances and the degree of harm to society of the crime of bribery committed by them is not sufficient to make light for them. The Tribunal rendered its judgement.

In January 2019, the case of Fai, former Deputy Secretary of the Party Committee, Board Member and General Manager of China's Huai Xian International Holdings Ltd., suspected of bribery in the day, was closed by the Tianjin City Monitoring Committee and referred to the Public Prosecution Service for prosecution. The Supreme People ' s Procuratorate designates jurisdiction and the prosecution is reviewed by the Second Division of the People ' s Procuratorate of Tianjin. The Second Division of the People ' s Procuratorate of Tianjin city makes a decision to arrest Fai during the day in accordance with the law.

He used to watch the anti-corruption film with the Leigh people. Mirror

On 13 January 2020, the network of the National Supervisory Commission of the Central Disciplinary Commission launched the second edition of the television feature, " General Monitoring " . The episode gives a detailed account of the case of Lai Lai, who has had a very bad impact in the area of finance and whose lessons have been sorely learned, and which was featured in the feature film during the day.

It's an anti-corruption feature.

The director-in-chief of Huai Lan International said during the day that he was mostly from his hometown. So the individual is very colourful, and he does not hide himself from this arbitrariness, which he enjoys and admires.

If he goes up, he will certainly need to perform, and he will not consider what the long-term risks will be, if you give me the scale first and the short-term profits will be realized, and he will not care about the risks of the project three or five years later. If he's going to pursue short-term performance, then we'll have to invest in some relatively high-risk projects, like real estate, like stock.

The professional nature of the financial sector, the gaps created by the regulation of the sector, together with the deliberate evasion of regulation by the small population, make it difficult for external regulation to arrive, and the internal oversight of Huai Liang has become ineffective and ineffective.

He was sentenced and executed.

Figure: Chinese courts' online interdiction

On 5 January 2021, the Second Intermediate People ' s Court of Tianjin City publicly sentenced the former Secretary-General of the Chinese Party, Chairman of the Board of Directors of China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-China-United-United-United States-China-United States-United States-United States-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations Treaty Organization-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United Nations-United

On 29 January 2021, after the second trial at Tianjin High Court upheld the sentence, and with the approval of the Supreme People ' s Court, the second court of Tianjin carried out the death penalty against Lui Xiaomin in accordance with the law. The case of embezzlement, bribery and bigamy was the first case in which the death penalty had been imposed for corruption and bribery offences since the eighteenth anniversary of the party.