I've heard Thai technology sue An Shi-Nang.

According to information from IT House, on 5 June, the official public issue Ansei Semiconductor China Ltd. (hereinafter “Ansei China”) today stated that the case had been brought before the judicial authorities following the wrongful intervention of Thai technology against Ansien Netherlands.

According to An Shi-China, Tsai Tsai has filed a case against An Shi-Netherlands with the Dong-chung City Intermediate People ' s Court of Guangdong Province, which has filed a case.

The core claims of Thai science and technology are to demand confirmation that the conduct was unlawful, to restore control over the core assets and to claim damages.

Extend Reading

According to the announcement of May 23, 2026, Thai Technology, the six defendants in this suit were Anssel Holdings Ltd., Anssel Ltd., Ruben Efrad Herad Lichtenberg, Achim Albert Kenpe, Stefan Tillger and Anteco Ltd.

According to the announcement, its subsidiary had previously received a ministerial order from the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy of the Netherlands and a ruling from the Business Court of the Amsterdam Court of Appeal, which had resulted in the company's control over the Ansien Semiconductor being restricted. The company considers that these measures constitute “discriminatory restrictions” under the Law of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Sanctions.

The specific case in this case is No. 117 (2026) 19 Uchi. The claims filed by Thai technology included a request to the court to order the defendant to pay joint and several damages for economic losses, to be set aside at RMB 8 billion, and to order the transfer of the Ensei semiconductor ' s interest in the main subsidiary of China to its name.

This case was the first to be invoked by a company listed in stock A as a core legal basis in civil proceedings against foreign government measures since the application of the Law of the People ' s Republic of China on Anti-Foreign Sanctions, and the significance of its judicial practice has received extensive attention from the market and the legal community.

The dispute between Thai technology and the control of Ansien Netherlands began at the end of September 2025, when the Dutch government took over Ansai semiconductor on national security grounds.

On 19 November 2025, the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs announced that it had suspended its previous intervention against the Ansei Semiconductor and returned control to its parent company to smell Thai technology. Since then, however, there has been no substantial progress in the consultations between the parties on the restoration of control and the supply chain.

On 22 December 2025, the Ministry of Commerce indicated that Thai Science and Technology had held its first round of consultations with the head of the An Shih Netherlands to explain and clarify their concerns and agreed to continue to communicate. China calls on the relevant enterprises to consult on control and restoration of the supply chain.

In a statement dated 23 May 2026, S.T.T. rejected the claim by the Netherlands that it had avoided communication, stating that it had repeatedly obstructed the audit and refused to provide core information, leading to an “unexpressed opinion” on its 2025 financial report and internal controls. As a result, the company was given an exit risk warning effective 6 May 2026.

Advertising statements: The external jump links (including not limited to hyperlinks, 2D codes, passwords, etc.) contained in the text are used to convey more information and save time for selection purposes only for reference purposes, which are included in all IT House articles.