aimode.news
Published on

The final trial of the owner of the "Strimson's Counselor's Right to Honour" case: full compensation for a half a million Mihawa.

Authors

On June 4th, information from IT House, the Miha Travel Department of Justice wrote today that the case of the Miha Travel vs. Networkist Le Chi, an online “Strike Seeker” against the Right to Honour was finally decided.

The court of first instance in this case found that the defendant, Le Chi, had violated the reputational rights of Miha Travel Company and sentenced him to full compensation of $500,000, and made a public apology on the full web of platforms such as the Voice, Station B, and the court of second instance finally upheld the sentence.

According to the Miha Travel Law Department, prior to that, Le Chi used his network accounts on stations B, Dancing, Fast Hand, Little Red Book, etc., in order to obtain a black flow and commit long-term violations:

(1) The extensive use of extremist and insulting terms against the Miha Traveler, the Miha Travel Company and its banner, The God of the Nativity, The Star Dome Road, The End Zero;

(2) The wide distribution of improper game judgments by one-sided, unreasonable and objective criteria, misleading the gamer's judgement, triggering community rivalry and inciting the player to retreat;

(3) Taking third-party commercial orders in the course of the commission of the above-mentioned acts and taking advantage of the black flow for profit by insulting the eyes.

In response to the above-mentioned violations, Mikhail Mihwa has taken action to defend his rights through complaints, reports, prosecutions and reporting. Following a previous report to the public security authorities in Miha, the police found that Le Chi had committed an offence of misrepresenting the facts, spreading rumours and disturbing public order, and had imposed administrative penalties on him in accordance with the law.

The court of first instance in the case found that Le Chi created and published the video not for the purpose of sharing game strategies as a common player, but for the public interest, for the purposes of press reporting and public opinion monitoring, and that its publication was motivated by commercial interests and clearly profitable. The use of insulting, extreme words in several videos, the unreasonable evaluation of the game and the unfair comparison of the game, the rejection of the Miha game, the misleading judgement of the player about the quality of the game, and the guidance of the player to “go back” “go back”, have exceeded the reasonable limits of the evaluation of the game and constitute a violation of the right to honour in Miha.

In the end, the court, taking into account the market reputation of the Mihawan and the games under its banner, the extent of the impact of the violation, the extent of the fault of Le Chi, and the purpose, manner, consequences of the violation, supported all the claims of Mihawan and ruled that:

(1) Public statements in multiple related accounts at station B, in the shivering, in the fast hand and in the little red book, to apologize to the Miha Travel Company and eliminate its effects;

(2) Compensation to Miha Travel for economic losses of $500,000.

The court of second instance upheld the sentence.

The IT House noted that, as of the time of the submission, Le Chi had publicly issued an apology on the platform accounts at station B under its control, the shivering, the fast hand, the little red book, etc.

Advertising statements: The external jump links (including not limited to hyperlinks, 2D codes, passwords, etc.) contained in the text are used to convey more information and save time for selection purposes only for reference purposes, which are included in all IT House articles.

The final trial of the owner of the "Strimson's Counselor's Right to Honour" case: full compensation for a half a million Mihawa. | aimode.news