The man's blind date was awarded 260,000 on the third day of 5 minutes.

In recent days, a man from Te Qing, Lake County, met a Shaanxi woman through a local marriage agency. The two men finalized their intentions by only a five-minute video call. The next day, the bride-in-law group arranged a car for the bride to be taken to Lake County, and on the third day, the marriage was hurriedly registered. Unforeseen to live together for only nine days after marriage, the man unexpectedly discovered that the woman had concealed nearly $100,000 in foreign debt and that the account numbers were abnormal and he repented for having proposed a divorce. The woman claimed that she suffered from diseases such as depression as a result of the divorce dispute and demanded compensation, and the marriage broker questioned the fact that the two were trying to fake the divorce to collect an introduction fee and were in dispute, which provoked debate.

According to Mr. Goo (alias), he was born in 1993 and is 32 years old. He is an only child in the family and has long been forced into marriage by his parents. In order to resolve the issue of marriage, Mr. Koo was introduced to register at a marriage agency in Teqing, Lake County, and paid a fee of $200. He had previously been introduced to three local women by the marriage agency, who had been unable to reach a relationship due to various problems.

Following up, she proposed to Mr. Ko that an attempt could be made to reach out to a foreign match-making audience, stating that a match-making match-making outside the country could be entered into in a day or two. Mr. Koo informed his parents that his family, despite their concerns, was anxious for him to start a family and eventually agreed to try.

Fig. Female Information

Her wife then held a video call for two people for only five minutes. In the video, Mr. Koo briefly asked about the woman ' s work, her family, and was more satisfied with her appearance. According to the information received, the woman was born in 1996 and claimed to work as a salesman. During the conversation, the woman spoke very little and most of the questions were answered by the bridesmaid. By promising to Mr. Gu that she would prepare a full letter and a report on the marriage before the marriage, the bride removed her initial concerns and the parties finalized the marriage.

His mother, who had proposed that Mr. Koo personally visit Shaanxi, had offered to pay extra money for the trip, fearing that there would be a risk. For this purpose, Mr. Koo ' s family paid a total of US$ 5,000 in road charges, US$ 10,000 in deposits and a bride price, totalling US$ 265,000.

On 20 April, the day after the video match-up, a number of local red-cheeks accompanied her to Dexiang, Lake County, early in the morning, a group of people arrived at the house of Mr. Koo at more than 11 p.m. The woman has been following her all the time. Mr. Koo has had no opportunity to communicate with her alone, and her parents have not come. Even so, Mr. Koo and his family still have a good impression of the woman as a whole, with the assurances of the Red Mother that she will not have any external debt, that she will be in good health and that the family will end up on guard.

On 21 April, the day after the woman ' s arrival in Lake County, the two were officially registered for marriage, accompanied by the Red Mother, and Mr. Koo ' s family prepared a red bag for her. In retrospect, Mr. Koo was still afraid: “Not even the woman's parents were able to see the other's true family situation, character and personal information, and the marriage took place in a state of confusion”.

It's a marriage certificate.

A number of anomalies were gradually revealed after the certification. Mr. Kou stated that on the first day of the certificate, women were easy to sleep in their beds on a day-to-day basis and did not think about their diet, although they were in a stable mood and asked questions, but in an abnormal state. Following the delay in the receipt of the letter report, Mr. Koo, who had expressed doubts about the offer to accompany her to the bank to print the letter, was strongly contradicted.

On 22 April, the two men went to the bank to enquire about the letter, and Mr. Gu found that the woman had an external debt of nearly $100,000. In the face of questioning, the woman argued that the debt was owed by her ex-boyfriend and had nothing to do with herself. In addition to this, Mr. Koo found that she had five or six micro-signs and that the daily payment account number was not his own. In response, the woman explained that she needed to work in a sales profession. Mr. Koo's fears have been heightened by multiple suspicions.

After the marriage, Mr. Koo, who intended to place her in a hotel where she worked, helped her to stabilize her life, was rejected by the woman. Since then, she has been living at home, unwilling to work and very little to eat, and Mr. Gu ' s mother has prepared her meals many times, which is not acceptable to her.

According to Mr. Koo, on the same day the Red Mother accompanied the two men in order to complete the marriage, but he has not yet seen the official report of the marriage. On 23 April alone, the woman received information that the marriage examination revealed that her liver function was high and required weight reduction, but that it did not affect the birth, that there was no contradiction between the two at that time, and that Mr. Koo had ordered each other to rest and prepare for pregnancy.

Two chat records.

On 24 April, the woman, who had been living together for only two days, returned to her home to pack her bags and did not return to Lake County until 28 April. The core problem of women's concealment of their external debt had not been solved, and there had been a complete outbreak of conflict, frequent quarrels and divorces. At first, the woman agreed to divorce by mutual agreement, and then, at the advice of the bride, she calmed down. On 29 April, another heated dispute erupted between the two sides over the debt issue.

In the morning, the woman gave a different version of the marital conflict. She stated that Mr. Koo's insistence on divorce was not simply a result of external debt, but also aversion to making up, not doing housework and not going out to work. As early as the night of 22 April, Mr. Koo claimed he had been deceived, and in the early morning hours of 23 April, when he was dissatisfied with his debt, questioned the value of the presentation fee and had had a serious dispute with the bride-in-law, which had long been a serious problem.

In response to the dispute, the sister-in-charge of the marriage agency was interviewed by a journalist for a detailed fee. She indicated that she had introduced Mr. Koo to the 17 persons whom Mr. Koo had previously proposed to take care of an acquaintance, at a fee of only $200, far below the normal fee of $5,000. Of the total cost of US$ 265,000 paid by Mr. Koo, US$ 100,000 was paid to the woman as a bride price, US$ 5,000 was spent on the cost of travelling to and from her home, and the remaining US$ 160,000 was allocated to the four brides.

On 3 May, tensions between the two sides escalated completely. In the morning, it was stated that Mr. Koo had forced herself to leave the house that night, that she had no choice but to carry her luggage out of the house alone and that he had offered to return the $100,000 bride price in full. As a result of the inability to register for divorce during the 5-1 leave period, the parties agreed to divorce by agreement on 6 May, with the possibility of a temporary change in the woman ' s voice and a direct change to sue for divorce, claiming that the long-term divorce dispute caused her to suffer from depression and other illnesses, and claiming Mr. Koo 50,000 yuan for medical and moral damages. The sister-in-charge of the marriage broker, however, revealed that the actual amount claimed by the woman was as high as 500,000 yuan, a significant departure from the statement of 50,000 yuan.

After the marriage was completely broken down, Mr. Koo asked the marriage agent for $160,000 for an introduction fee, which he refused to refund on the grounds that “the marriage was successful and the subsequent dispute was not related to the intermediary”. Moreover, the five-year-old administrator, who had promoted dozens of marriages, had stated that she had not committed any fraud, but had challenged Mr. Koo ' s and his wife ' s intention to fraudulently collect the services of an intermediary by means of a false divorce.

In order to verify the dispute over the amount claimed, the journalist again called the woman to testify in the morning, and the other party suspended the telephone in haste on the grounds of poor signal, failing to confirm the specific amount claimed. At present, both parties have taken legal steps to defend their rights, and Mr. Goo has sued the marriage agency for the refund of the fee, while the woman has sued Mr. Goo for medical compensation. The case is still pending and follow-up progress will continue.

Source: Urban Express, copyrighted by the original author.

== sync, corrected by elderman ==