When the former Deputy Director of the Public Security Bureau was released from prison, he made a public report:

In 2024, the former Deputy Director-General of the Hung County Public Security Bureau of Yunnan town and 46-year-old Wang Kenwu was sentenced to four years ' imprisonment for bribery and negligence. Upon his release from prison, he maintained that he was innocent and had been complaining but without progress.

Wang's case was remanded to the court in order to resume the proceedings.

In January 2026, he raised concerns about Li Chiu, Deputy Director of the Standing Committee on behalf of the Working Committee of the National and District People ' s Congresses, who had an identity card and had a real name on the social platform.

Wang Kenwu explained that the reason for continuing to report the case after the sentence was that “part of the simultaneous audio-recorded video was transferred, comparing the interview notes produced by the original case officer, Li Yao-chung and Li, with the obvious problems of tampering and forgery, and instead of being prosecuted, they were gradually promoted”.

The former Deputy Director of the Public Security Bureau was accused of receiving millions of money.

The court found that he was “renevolent” in a black case.

On 2 July 2020, 42-year-old Wang Sword-Wu was placed in detention. At that time, he served as Deputy Director-General of the Public Security Bureau of the Yu County of Town, as well as as as the Commander of the Anti-Drug Investigation Brigade (formerly the Anti-Drug Brigade), and in January 2018, the Central Department deployed a three-year special anti-Drug campaign, with the name of the anti-Drug Department of the Public Security System in various areas being changed to the Anti-Drug Unit. The following text shall read as follows: On 25 October of the same year, he was held in criminal detention.

Soon, the Public Prosecutor ' s Office of Zhejiang County in Zhao Tong City filed a public indictment against Wang Kenwu, and the Zhoujiang District Court handed down its first judgement on 13 September 2021. Wang's swordsman appealed.

On 28 December 2022, the Zhao Tong City Court remanded the case to the Zhejiang District Court on the grounds that “the original judgement found that some of the facts were unclear and insufficient evidence”.

On 13 March 2024, the Zhejiang District Court found that Wang and Sword-Wu knew each other in 2017 in the case of a trader, Leung Ming, who had been hunted down. Since 2019, Wang's sword-moo has received a total of 1279.96 million yuan in property in the name of Liang, and has since helped Liang to collect debts and settle children.

In addition, during his tenure as Commander of the Black Brigade of the Public Security Bureau of Yuzhou, Wang Kenwu was accused of numerous criminal acts against Wu Xiaozhong and others. The evidence and clues have shown that he is guilty of crimes and has not been investigated as a case involving a crime, nor has he been followed up. The case was long overdue during the work of the Vice-President of the Hung County Department of Public Security of the town, Wang Wu, under the chairmanship and in charge of the Black Brigade, and the members of the gang committed new offences in violation of the law. Following repeated reactions from the victims, the court decided the case to be a criminal gang of the forces of evil, with adverse social consequences.

The court sentenced Wang to four years ' imprisonment for bribery and negligence.

Wang swordsword refused and appealed. On 23 December 2024, the Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the sentence.

Publicly report after release.

"They tampered with my case and forged evidence."

The decision of the Chong Chong Chamber is final, which means that Wang has no opportunity to appeal and that if he is found innocent, he can only defend his rights through trial supervision proceedings. At present, Wang's complaint is still pending.

On 2 January 2026, Wang Sword-Wu, with his identity card, reported to the Deputy Director General of the Standing Committee on behalf of the Working Committee, Li Chiu, the head of the correspondence bureau of the city of Hung County.

Wang's handyman holds his ID and reports on social platforms.

“There is nothing to be done about a report of an actual name, since none of the relevant infractions that I have submitted have received any feedback from the authorities.” Wang Kenwu said.

In the video of the report, Wang Kenwu stated that Li had previously abused his authority and that he had committed a series of offences, including forgery and systematic false records, on suspicion of abuse of authority and perjury.

Wang Kenwu stated that he had been detained and that he had reported a number of cases, including Qin and Zhu Hoi, who had been sentenced, on the grounds that the investigation procedure against the perpetrators was illegal. One of Li's countries and Li's people are also in charge of the case, “They tampered with the statements of one of Li's clients for the purpose of investigating me”.

The facts established by the Qin and Zhu Chiu District Court of Zhouyang City, which were reported by Wang's swordwu, refer to: In March 2020, the officer in charge of the case, Qin Qin, leaked the case to Zhu Zhu Zhou, who was not a member of the investigation team, without the approval of his leadership, to investigate the witness Song Zi and others and to revise the report. During this period, she received $20,000 in cash from Song.

In the end, Qin and Zhu Chii were sentenced to one year and two months and two years and two months for the offence of abuse of office, for bribery, bribery and abuse of office.

With regard to the impact of the crimes committed by the two men, Zhao Tong City Central Court referred in its Criminal Judgement in Wang Kenwu that Zhu Chiu was merely a macro-opinion for Qin, that he had greeted some of his witnesses during the taking of evidence, and that in the present case there were witness statements taken by others other than Qin.

“The contents of the statement and the simultaneous audio and video recordings

It's not what it means.

In connection with the forgery of evidence by Li and Li, Wang Kenwu provided a copy of the Legal Opinion on Synchronized Audio-Video, which refers to 17 of the 3 interrogation notes as being inconsistent with Synchronized Audio-Video. It refers to:

On 18 August 2020, between 2.20 p.m. and 4.46 p.m., the investigators asked Leung Ming “Why did you lend $1.28 million to Wang's Sword-Wu family without writing a note” and he called him “since Wang Sword-Wu is the deputy director of the Public Security Bureau and, on the basis of his status, I can hardly ask him to borrow a note. I thought he would not even call me, and I would ask him for help because he was the deputy director of the Public Security Bureau”. However, when the investigator questioned Leung, he did not answer the question.

In his statement, Leung’s testimony stated: “I can certainly tell you that I would not have borrowed so much money from Wang Zhongwu if he was not the Deputy Director-General of the Public Security Department of Yugyu County. I'm a man of the town, but I've been out of town for years, and I'm not familiar with him, and I've come to do business with him, and I need to know some special people, and I need the care and protection of people like Wang. The money I lent him, and I didn't ask him to pay it, and he didn't, and in fact, we both know that I gave him money by borrowing it.” In the simultaneous audio recording, Leung did not say that the real idea and purpose of borrowing money was because Wang Kenwu was Deputy Director General of the Public Security Bureau, and that he did not ask about the contents of the statement, as stated in his video.

In an interview note dated 19 August 2020 from 9.43 a.m. to 1.42 p.m., Leung specified that “if he is not the Deputy Director-General of the Public Security Bureau of the city, I will certainly not give him land or property. I gave him anything for his care and help”. In the synchronous audio-recording, Leung’s words were “because of the bad business in the scenery, the epidemic did not earn money for three years, so he gave it to Wang Sword-Wu and then took it out of the bonus, and he built the house”.

"Twelve notes, only three times to bring out synchronized audio recordings."

The witness claims that a lot of things you haven't said are on the record.

Wang Kenwu explained that Leung had made 12 successive statements in cooperation with the police, but only three had been able to transmit the simultaneous recordings, and all the other simultaneous recordings had been covered.

On 9 May, a journalist from the Chinese merchant press contacted Leung. He states that at the first hearing in the Wang Kenwo case, he watched the hearing live and found that the transcripts given to him by the prosecution were inconsistent with his actual account, “a lot of what I did not say was in the transcripts, which I did not understand.”

“The police have asked me to cooperate with them more than a dozen times, I have a low literacy level and I know only a few words, and when they asked me to sign, I did not read the notes. They didn't read me any notes." “I do not think that I am protected by Wang's sword. I am the government of the county of the city of Yu County, which is the source of money and which has problems with direct access to the county's leadership.” “Some of the things that Wang Sword-Wu mentioned in the judgment did not actually help me. For example, after one year of this incident, I told the county leadership that the county public security bureau had established a task force.”

“I am legally responsible for what I have said, and I will not accept what I have not said in my statement.”

In response, counsel for Wang Kenwu stated that it was true that one of Liang's key witnesses accused Wang's bribe-earthed witness, whose interrogation notes were inconsistent with the simultaneous recording of the video, had been questioned more than a dozen times by the police of the town of Hung County, and that only three simultaneous recordings could be produced and there were problems of inconsistency with the transcript. As required by the case, the statement of questioning is to be synchronized with the audio and video recordings and kept on diskette. Ask, why don't you take out the other simultaneous recordings?"

“In two of the three notes drawn up, two were made by the State and the State.” According to counsel.

Court: Exclusion of non-conformity of statement and admission of witness pre-trial testimony

The reported person responded to the media: the report was false and the investigation was ongoing

The Chinese Commercial News Channel journalist noted alleged inconsistencies between the simultaneous audio and video recordings and the transcripts, as reported by Wang Kenwu and others, which were also reflected in the second-instance judgement of the Central Court of Zhao Tong.

The figure is the Central College of Choun.

The criminal judgement shows that, in the case of the interrogation notes in which Li was involved, Li, Li and others, the content of the transcript was not consistent with the simultaneous recording of the case, and that there were problems with the means of questioning, etc., but not with the testimony of witnesses collected by unlawful means such as violence, threats, etc., which was not excluded from the scope of the illegal evidence, could be accepted in the same way as the simultaneous recording, which was used in the case.

The testimony given by Leung before the court was inconsistent with the pre-trial testimony, which could not be reasonably explained, and whose testimony was corroborated by other evidence, and which could be corroborated by simultaneous audio and video evidence.

In other words, although the interview transcript of Leung was not consistent with the simultaneous recording, the court, after excluding the content of the discrepancy, accepted the testimony of Leung before the court, thus characterization of Wang's passive bribery.

Wang was helpless and indicated that, at the judicial level, he would continue to appeal to a higher court. At the same time, in his view, even if he was guilty, there was no reason for the author to tamper with the record. Whether or not the evidence was admitted, the case officer should be held responsible for abuse of authority and perjury, and he asked the relevant authorities of the municipality to intervene in the investigation and deal with it.

The Chinese merchant newspaper Chase journalist contacted Lee, the head of the correspondence bureau in Yuzhou, and said, “You know what we have to do with our department.” He then hung up. Earlier, Li replied to the press that Wang's reports were false and that investigations were under way.

The journalist contacted Li Chiu, Deputy Director of the Standing Committee on behalf of the Working Committee, who hung up.

Journalists contacted the Publicity Department of the Yuyuan District Commission and did not receive a response.

In addition, according to Red Star News, the Board of Supervisors of the Zhao Tong City Disciplinary Commission has stated that Wang Kenwu ' s complaint has been admitted and that no conclusive response has yet been received.

Zhang Pengkang, editor, Liu Man Rain